Is an Hungarian Cardinal opposing Pope Francis on Motu Proprio limiting Traditional Latin Mass?

Budapest, Hungary, Jul 19, 2021 / 10:05 am

Early on Monday, July 19, a fake “decretum” from Cardinal Péter Erdö, Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest and primate of Hungary, started to circulate on social media. But, the Hungarian cardinal has not published a statement nor a “decretum” opposing Pope Francis’ motu proprio Traditionis Custodes.

According to the document, the Cardinal essentially declared the Catholic Church in Hungary in de facto rebellion of Pope Francis’ motu proprio Traditionis Custodes by keeping the norms of the Traditional Mass established by Pope Benedict’s Summorum Pontificum. 

The now-deleted message allegedly originated in the Reddit social network. It was then retweeted massively, even among prominent Catholic Twitter users, and attributed the following statement to the Hungarian Primate:

“The Primate of Hungary has right by a letter of privilege from the Apostolic See in 1347, which has never been abrogated. It states that the Primate is free to decide on liturgical matters within the territory of all of Hungary and over all Hungarians. The motu proprio of 16 July 2021 does not mention any limitation of the aforementioned privilege. This gives me the right, according to the general norms of the Code of Canon Law, to regulate the question of the “forma extraordinaria” of the Holy Mass, by my own discretion. By this present decretum, I declare that, by virtue of the privilege given to my office, I will continue regulate the celebration of the Tridentine Liturgy on the basis of the practice as it has been (since 2007), which is the same as that provided for in the Motu [sic] proprio Summorum Pontificum.”

Eduard Habsburg, Ambassador of Hungary to the Holy See and a Catholic close to Cardinal Erdö, tweeted a clarification: “The text circulating on the internet by ‘Cardinal Erdö’ on a ‘liturgy privilege of 1347’ is  100% fake! Don’t trust texts that originate on Reddit!”

Since Habsburg’s tweet, several Twitter users deleted the false statement.